Force majeure

(VLR) Never the term “force majeure” has been as much concerned as since COVID-19 through a number of cases, such as, The tenant did not pay the rent, returned the house, reclaimed the deposit for the reason of force majeure. Was that right? Logistics service companies, trading companies could not deliver, receive goods or violated delivery deadlines because of a shortage of workers due to concentrated isolation, even companies had to close due to COVID-19. Could they refuse to pay damages? Could we claim insurance companies for damages caused by COVID-19? For flights canceled by a government order due to COVID-19, had the travel company to return the airfares or deposits to its travellers immediately? Borrowing money from banks to buy and sell goods or services but not being able to do business, was it allowed to refuse or delay the payment of interest or late payment of principal due to COVID-19? Bank was unable to collect debts due to COVID-19. Was it a force majeure event?

A force majeure event is an event that happens in an objective, unexpected and insurmountable manner despite the application of all necessary measures and allowances

A force majeure event is an event that happens in an objective, unexpected and insurmountable manner despite the application of all necessary measures and allowances

What is a force majeure event?

"A force majeure event is an event that happens in an objective, unexpected and insurmountable manner despite the application of all necessary measures and allowances” (Clause 1, Article 156 of the 2015 Civil Code). Thus, there are three issues to consider whether an event is a force majeure one or not: (1) objective; (2) unexpected; and (3) insurmountable. “Objective” is understood to happen due to natural or human causes which cannot be known by the affected party, such as tsunamis, earthquakes, natural disasters, epidemics, etc .; “Unexpected” is beyond the control of man; and “insurmountable” is an attempt to implement all solutions but cannot be resolved.

What are the conditions for being exempt from liability due to force majeure event?

In contractual relationship, the proof of a force majeure event will help the violating party not to pay damages or perform its obligations. Clause 2, Article 351 of the 2015 Civil Code stipulates: “In the case of failure to perform obligations by the obligor due to force majeure he is not liable for civil liability, unless otherwise agreed or otherwise provided for by law.” Clause 1, Article 294 of the 2005 Law on Commerce states: “A party that breaches a contract shall be exempted from liability in the following cases: ... b) A force majeure event occurs”. Regarding the liability to pay damages in tort, Clause 2, Article 584 of the 2015 Civil Code states: “The damage-maker is not liable to pay damages in case the damage is caused by force majeure events”. In order to be exempt from liability due to a force majeure event, the violating party must: (1) Immediately notify the other party in writing according to Clause 1, Article 295 of the 2005 Law on Commerce on the case of exemption from responsibility and possible consequences; (2) Prove that a force majeure event has occurred; (3) Prove that a force majeure event directly affects the performance of contractual obligations; (4) Prove that all necessary measures and permissible possibilities have been taken but cannot be overcome. If a contract (among Vietnamese legal entities) does not stipulate force majeure, it may be based on the provisions of Sub-clause b, Clause 1, Article 294 (Cases of exemption from liability for violations) of the 2005 Law on Commerce when a force majeure event happened.

Some disputes on force majeure

1. A Vietnamese company sold rice to a Philippine company. While the ship chartered by the buyer was on the way to Haiphong to receive rice, the seller said that the Prime Minister of Vietnam had decided to stop exporting rice from March 24, 2020 to ensure food security due to COVID-19. Therefore, they could not deliver rice to the ship and considered this to be a force majeure event. The buyer assumed that the seller was partly responsible for the damage due to the ship already on the way to port. The seller’s viewpoint that the buyer had to bear all the losses of no cargo for the ship due to force majeure was right.

2. That a logistics company shipping goods in a city did not carry out the contract with the reason that their workers left jobs due to COVID-19 as a force majeure was not a proof good enough for acceptance because it had to prove whether he had outsourced the carriage of goods to other company but in vain.

3. Two companies signed a barter contract. Accordingly, the Thai Company (TC) carried sugar to Vietnam to receive rice from the Vietnamese Company (VC). Under the contract, VC ought to apply for permits of rice export and sugar import; TC ought to apply for a permit of rice import. Although VC had not yet been granted permits of rice export and sugar import, VC still asked TC to charter a ship to carry sugar and load rice. TC had chartered a ship to carry sugar from Bangkok port of Thailand. The ship arrived at the port, waited for a long time but unexpectedly TC informed the carrier that it could not arrange a permit to import sugar and considered it a force majeure event. Therefore, he was exempted from liability for damages caused to the carrier. The carrier was right when holding that this case was a force majeure event but only for the barter contract between TC and VC, not a force majeure event for the voyage charter party of sugar between TC and the carrier because TC could “expect” the possibility that VC could not obtain the permit for sugar import by requesting VC to supply it before chartering the ship.

A few notes on force majeure

1. Conditions one and two of a force majeure event may be satisfied, but the condition three being “unexpected and insurmountable manner despite the application of all necessary measures and allowances” needs to be proven to be accepted by the dispute resolution institution in case of legal actions.

2. Many contracts list events that are considered force majeure but are still short of the word “epidemics” which need to add because no one can make sure that in the future there will be no more similarities.

3. When signing related contracts, there may be a force majeure event with this contract but no with the other one (the barter contract above mentioned).

4. It is better to negotiate and help each other if possible because the “winning” party also loses effort, time, and “time is money”.

5. It is not a must to perform obligations when force majeure occurs. Therefore, the parties suffer at their own risk and do not have the right to claim compensation or request to share the damage.

6. Do not abuse force majeure to refuse to perform the obligations because they will not be accepted by the judicial institution, and lose the case, having more damage because of discrediting and losing partners.

Ngo Khac Le - VIAC Arbitrator

Ý kiến bạn đọc

Chưa có ý kiến nào. Hãy là người để lại ý kiến đầu tiên.

Ý kiến của bạn

0

Tối thiểu 10 chữTiếng Việt có dấuKhông chứa liên kếtGửi bình luận

Vui lòng nhập mã bảo mật để gửi bình luận lên hệ thống
Gửi bình luận

Sửa đổi quy định để quản lý chặt kho, bãi, địa điểm kiểm tra hàng hóa

20 Giờ trước

Nhóm vấn đề về quản lý kho, bãi, địa điểm đang được Tổng cục Hải quan nghiên cứu để đưa vào quy định cụ thể trong dự thảo sửa đổi Thông tư số 38/2015/TT-BTC ngày 25/3/2015 của Bộ trưởng Bộ Tài chính nhằm ngăn chặn kịp thời các nguy cơ gian lận, lợi dụng chính sách thông quan để buôn lâu, gian lận thương mại.

Luật Giao thông đường bộ sửa đổi trình Chính phủ có gì mới?

Ngày 31/07/2020 lúc 14:30

Bộ GTVT vừa trình Chính phủ dự thảo Luật Giao thông đường bộ (GTĐB) sửa đổi với nhiều điểm mới... Theo Bộ GTVT, Luật GTĐB năm 2008 sau hơn 10 năm thực hiện đã tạo hành lang pháp lý cho hoạt động giao thông đường bộ, góp phần hình thành ý thức tuân thủ pháp luật, đảm bảo trật tự ATGT, thúc đẩy phát triển GTVT và kinh tế đất nước.

HSBC: Việt Nam sẽ là quốc gia ASEAN duy nhất tăng trưởng dương năm nay và bứt lên 8,5% trong năm 2021

21 Giờ trước

Mới đây, trong báo cáo về thị trường cận biên (Frontier Market) tại châu Á, HSBC đã đánh giá cao thị trường Việt Nam với nhiều lý do để lạc quan về triển vọng kinh tế.

Chuyển đổi số trong ngành dịch vụ logistics Việt Nam

Ngày 03/08/2020 lúc 14:55

Trong bối cảnh khôi phục và phát triển dịch vụ logistics do ảnh hưởng của đại dịch COVID-19, Hiệp định Thương mại tự do giữa Việt Nam – EU (EVFTA) đã chính thức có hiệu lực từ ngày 01/8/2020, mở ra cánh cửa mới và tạo động lực cho sự phát triển kinh tế Việt Nam nói chung và các doanh nghiệp (DN) xuất nhập khẩu (XNK), cung cấp dịch vụ logistics (LSP) nói riêng. Công nghệ số nhằm phục vụ cho động lực đó.

Tạp chí Vietnam Logistics Review: Bổ nhiệm Phó Tổng Biên tập

Ngày 03/08/2020 lúc 13:52

Ngày 03/8/2020 tại Tòa soạn Tạp chí Vietnam Logistics Review (VLR), thừa ủy quyền của Hiệp hội Doanh nghiệp dịch vụ Logistics Việt Nam (VLA), Tiến sĩ Lê Văn Hỷ - Tổng Biên tập Tạp chí VLR đã trao quyết định bổ nhiệm chức vụ Phó Tổng Biên tập cho bà Phạm Kim Liên theo Quyết định số 01/VLA-QĐ của Chủ tịch VLA - Cơ quan chủ quản của Tạp chí VLR ký ngày 01/8/2020.

Thời tiết

TP Hồ Chí Minh

Hiện tại

26°

Mây rải rác

06/08

24° - 31°

Mưa giông

07/08

24° - 28°

Mưa giông

08/08

24° - 29°

Mưa giông

Nguồn: Weathers Underground

Tỷ giá ngoại tệ

Tỷ giá ngoại tệ cập nhật vào 05/08/2020 04:50
Mã NTTiền mặtChuyển khoảnBán
USD23,060.0023,090.0023,270.00
AUD16,071.2716,233.6116,742.47
EUR26,552.7326,820.9427,906.96
GBP29,528.3929,826.6630,761.62
JPY211.17213.30221.26
SGD16,421.5316,587.4017,107.36
THB656.55729.50756.89
Nguồn: Vietcombank

Giá xăng dầu

Giá xăng, dầu cập nhật ngày 04/08/2020 23:50
Loại xăng dầuĐơn vịGiá vùng 1Giá vùng 2
Dầu hỏa 2-KVND/L1027010470
DO 0,001S-VVND/L1259012840
DO 0,05S-IIVND/L1239012630
E5 RON 92-IIVND/L1440014680
Xăng RON 95-IIIVND/L1497015260
Xăng RON 95-IVVND/L1507015370
Nguồn: Petrolimex